One thing that I did forget to mention this last week is exactly how much I love my wife. Valentine’s Day this year was great - and not just because my wife cooked. Although I tried to convince her that I could take her out to some chic (lol yeah, chic, in Fairbanks) restaurant, she wanted, and virtually demanded, to cook. And it was such an utterly blissful evening I cannot truly descibe how great it was. I came home after a long day at work to a candlelit dinner in our dining room (cause, you know, we’ve got one now) and a 3 (or 4) course meal complete with:
Salad with Homemade Balsamic Vinegarette, Feta and Greek Olives
Balsamic Chicken with sauteed onions and morel mushrooms, served over liguine, all based in a garlic olive oil (from Stinking Rose in SF) sauce
Asparagus, soaked in garlic olive oil with garlic chunks
Orange Creamsicle Cake
Succulent - truly devine. Earlier that week we had had a romantic evening and watched “Just like Heaven” - pretty cute film and it’s set in SF so we could tell where half of it was filmed. Thank you Deanna - you’re the best thing in my life.
So, last Friday, Mike, Joe, Deanna and I went up to Silver Gulch Brewery up in Fox. On Fridays, between 5-6:30pm, they’ve got free beer tasting and it’s very much worth going to. I ended up picking myself up a case of the Pick Axe Porter and considering going up there this next weekend and picking up some of their Amber. Oddly enough, as much as I like Porters, theirs is a little too strong and bitter for me, but I still like it in moderation. Their Amber, however, has a slight porter taste to it and is actually extremely pleasing. Why go out to Fox to buy beer that I can get in town? Cause it’s $7.50 a 6-pack there rather than the $10-$12 that it’s in town.
I’ve also been enraged by the current news coverage of the American port issue. Anyone else think this is bull? Seriously, if the Bush Administration wouldn’t have allowed such a transfer of power to go through, citing security issues, and the press would’ve gotten ahold of it, the “story” in it would’ve been that the Bush Administration is racially profiling prospective companies citing that having Arab-based corporations in charge of our ports could possibly make it easier for terrorists to infiltrate and possibly even bypass American security measures. But, seeing that they didn’t do that, the press has decided to take the slant that they SHOULD have racially profiled these potential buyers and made them out to be potential security leaks. Why is it that when the NEWS NETWORKS suggest racial profiling it’s called “being security minded” and yet when the government racially profiles a group or company it’s shunned upon? Truth be told, I cannot quantify the possiblities behind a terrorist penetrating security via a non-arab-based-company controlled port and one that is controlled by a UAE company. Truth be told, nobody can. The sheer fact that Arab based company may control our ports does raise my eyebrow, yes, but those concerns are stereotypical and shouldn’t end up being international policy. What stops a terrorist from slipping through an American-based company’s security measures, especially when the news second-guesses security measures at these ports no-matter who controls them? If anything one would have to think that a successful Arab company may just want to prove us wrong about what America, as a whole, thinks of the Middle East - maybe, just maybe, it’d be more secure (I do hope), as a whole, because they’re trying to prove us wrong? I just can’t believe that the news networks are getting on Bush’s ass for being politically correct and providing equal opportunities to all companies, no matter where they’re based. That’s plain stupid - but because it has something to do with “big money” and “corporate america” and “republicans”, Bush has “GOT to be wrong”. Yeah, well, even though I don’t agree with a good amount of his policies, and although I see and understand the concern about having a Arab company in charge of these ports - I trust that we’ve done our damned homework enough, especially after 9/11, to figure out that this company checks out (I hope and pray so)- not to mention, solely disreguarding a company because of it’s country of orgin isn’t going to help out how our country looks to the people of that region.
I know that money was funnelled through UAE banks and that terrorists came from that country that did the 9/11 attacks. But should we base our opinion on a country over money laundering and 2 people? If there are legit reasons to believe that this company has terrorist TIES, then fine, they shouldn’t have any control at all over our ports. But if we cannot find any good reason to not let them take over these operations, short of the fact that they’re Arab, we’re racially profiling the damned company and are breaking the rules that this country has been built upon. It would make about as much sense as refusing to hire a Mexican cause “they are known to drug traffic”. Come on, America, wake up.